[Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 27 August 2023 00:25. [Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19. [Majorityrights Central] On an image now lost: Part 2 Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 15 February 2025 14:21. [Majorityrights News] Richard Williamson, 8th March 1940 - 29th January 2025 Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 03 February 2025 10:30. [Majorityrights Central] Freedom’s actualisation and a debased coin: Part 2 Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 11 January 2025 01:08. [Majorityrights News] KP interview with James Gilmore, former diplomat and insider from first Trump administration Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 05 January 2025 00:35. [Majorityrights Central] Aletheia shakes free her golden locks at The Telegraph Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 04 January 2025 23:06. [Majorityrights News] Former Putin economic advisor on Putin’s global strategy Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 30 December 2024 15:40. [Majorityrights News] Trump will ‘arm Ukraine to the teeth’ if Putin won’t negotiate ceasefire Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 12 November 2024 16:20. [Majorityrights News] Olukemi Olufunto Adegoke Badenoch wins Tory leadership election Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 02 November 2024 22:56. [Majorityrights News] What can the Ukrainian ammo storage hits achieve? Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 21 September 2024 22:55. [Majorityrights Central] An Ancient Race In The Myths Of Time Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, 21 August 2024 15:26. [Majorityrights Central] Slaying The Dragon Posted by James Bowery on Monday, 05 August 2024 15:32. [Majorityrights Central] The legacy of Southport Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 02 August 2024 07:34. [Majorityrights News] Farage only goes down on one knee. Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 29 June 2024 06:55. [Majorityrights News] An educated Russian man in the street says his piece Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 19 June 2024 17:27. [Majorityrights Central] Freedom’s actualisation and a debased coin: Part 1 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 07 June 2024 10:53. [Majorityrights News] Computer say no Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 09 May 2024 15:17. [Majorityrights News] Be it enacted by the people of the state of Oklahoma Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 27 April 2024 09:35. [Majorityrights Central] Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. [Majorityrights News] Moscow’s Bataclan Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. [Majorityrights News] Soren Renner Is Dead Posted by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. [Majorityrights News] Collett sets the record straight Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. [Majorityrights Central] Patriotic Alternative given the black spot Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. [Majorityrights Central] On Spengler and the inevitable Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. [Majorityrights News] Alex Navalny, born 4th June, 1976; died at Yamalo-Nenets penitentiary 16th February, 2024 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 16 February 2024 23:43. [Majorityrights News] A Polish analysis of Moscow’s real geopolitical interests and intent Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 06 February 2024 16:36. [Majorityrights Central] Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 24 January 2024 10:49. [Majorityrights News] Savage Sage, a corrective to Moscow’s flood of lies Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 12 January 2024 14:44. [Majorityrights Central] Twilight for the gods of complacency? Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. [Majorityrights Central] Milleniyule 2023 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 13:11. [Majorityrights Central] A Russian Passion Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 01:11. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 02 December 2023 00:39. [Majorityrights News] The legacy of Richard Lynn Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 31 August 2023 22:18. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 27 August 2023 00:25. [Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19. [Majorityrights Central] On an image now lost: Part 2 Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 15 February 2025 14:21. [Majorityrights News] Richard Williamson, 8th March 1940 - 29th January 2025 Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, 03 February 2025 10:30. I checked the site mailbox yesterday - something I have done less frequently since it was moved by the ISP to webmail, which I find to be a problematic platform. Anyway, I managed to access it and I’m glad I did because there were a couple of mails of real interest. One of them was a source of sadness, and confirmed the death of a past friend of MR and a man whom many more than just myself held in high respect. Wintermute - WM, for short - arrived at MR early in its history, at the same time as the also redoubtable ben tillman. Indeed, they operated on occasion rather like a tag team, and woe betide anyone who incurred their disfavour. WM’s mission was to convert the world to his version of the Single Jewish Cause. For some reason he had ventured away from his usual stamping ground at The Phora and selected MR as a suitable case for treatment. This was not actually what I needed at that time. Of course there was no reason that WM should hold back. He did not know that MR was an experiment on a highly unstable material, or that he was lighting a naked flame every time he came here. He did not stop to examine the cast of actors in this tragi-comedy. To him, conservatives and libertarians from Oz, paleos from the US, trad cons from the UK and Belgium and proto-nationalists from all over were all people equally in need of grasping the one thing guaranteed to blow the place sky-high. I attempted to keep my experiment running. He attempted to make it in his image. I avoided confrontation. He sought it. That was the way of things. Every barrier I threw up he dutifully dismantled - not always, it must be said, with the most insightful diagnosis of my ideological failings. Here, for example, he puts my resistance down to “social conservative propriety”:
This remains the only occasion on which anyone has informed me that social conservatism rather than, say, Weimar liberalism, could be a factor in the rise of National Socialism. Obviously, I had expected WM to be a make-believe National Socialist, like so many German-American WNs I had encountered on the net. But he wasn’t at all that way inclined. Probably, he was just too well read. Looking back at his commentary I find a WM who, although he couldn’t be clearer about the Jewish impact on our life, was never very clear about his own political antecedents and principles. MR was a place to which one came to contest those very goods. It was wholly predicated on the hierarchy of values which has, at its peak, the survival and continuity of European peoples, and on the inevitability that contact with that would inform and renew all who thought otherwise. But somehow WM floated above all that. I came close to nailing him down once or twice. I remember proffering the opinion one time that, had it survived Hitler’s wars of aggression, National Socialism would, over time, have de-radicalised and subsided into a conservative force in its own right. He agreed, to my surprise, and explained why. Shortly after, still trying to pigeon-hole the man, I offered the judgement that “You are, I believe, a white nationalist.” But nope, he confounded me again:
Then one day he was gone. In honour of him I wrote a piece about courage and the unity of men, and that was that. Or nearly that, because we then began an exchange of private mails in which more of him emerged. What I found was a man of the spirit, brave in the face of what seemed to be a debilitating illness that he would eventually be unable to beat. But he was spiritual in that other sense, too. He was, or had been, a Gurdjieffian; and his natural bent was not at all that of the angry, Jewphobic WN but of a man straining for some permanency and right, and doing it with culture and principle and, always, stylish prose. I remember saying that if he ever wants to write about his real worldview, minus the Jewish stuff, I would gladly publish it. But he didn’t want that. He was a dedicated fighter, a man who had taken a personal decision, a vow perhaps and much against his want and nature, about how he would proceed and why, and nothing could or would change it. Then he stopped replying, and there was no more contact. A few months ago Ben came on one of our threads and I asked him if WM was still in touch. He said he thought he was still down in Texas. But that turned out not to be true. The email I opened yesterday was from an old friend and accomplice of WM who, only just the other day, had read the exchange with Ben, and was very kindly writing to tell me that, in fact, WM passed away over two years ago. One of the lesser harms done to us by the Judaic struggle is that its necessary opposition consumes good men and good minds - sometimes, as in the case of WM, our best. What he might have achieved, had he not made the decision to plough such a narrow furrow, can never be known. It is another loss in a great history of losses that is the story of our people’s struggle to live a life fitted to us in peace and in freedom, and perhaps what WM really meant by “classical liberty”. Those who knew him will remember him well and with gratitude, as do I.
It is, of course, usual about this time of year for journalists in our esteemed mainstream media to ponder the year ahead. Well, if they can do it ... But as my record for predictions is somewhat patchy I thought I’d just stick to the headlines you will assuredly be reading. Or there again, possibly not. Stone-cold BBC poll: after the Census most white people say a non-white majority future is only fair Coming down the turnpike Prime Minister in waiting Liz Truss poses nude for Sunday Sport to prove that she is not, nor has she ever been, a man You never know Ad boss sought by police after one of his ads shows white male in positive light Never gonna happen Electoral Commission apologises and grants party status to Patriotic Alternative
... and don’t worry about injury figures. I’m sure it will be fine. After all, the British government is paying £22 a shot now, and ordering millions more doses for the upcoming fourth jab, seeing as how the positive effect of the third is only good for three months. At that kind of money it must be absolutely brilliant stuff, yeah? And if that doesn’t put you in a mood of seasonal cheer, just know that data on vaccine take-up by ethnicity has revealed today that the forthcoming Census will show us natives are down around low 70s as a percentage of the population. https://twitter.com/tfromthemeadow/status/1474331260688515102?s=20 Just don’t let up on the wild celebration of all things diverse, cuz our masters will soon need volunteers for their exciting new facility in Wellingborough: ... where you will no longer have to worry about whether you accept the vax or not. Some season of good cheer this is!
Any novel and genuine politics of change must possess a set of interlocking core principles derived from a theory of Man’s reduced condition and a countering and inspiring vision of what he properly is. That latter must be reflected in the ultimate value advanced by these politics, and the whole must be eminently communicable, indeed politically virulent; and for that people have to know that it is true. One shortfall in any of these respects and historical purchase will not be possible, even when the prevailing system is grown stale and unproductive, and the people yearn for a relevant and fresh, hopeful way forward. So poorly mapped out is ethnic nationalism, so poorly has it been served by thinking nationalists, and so unsympathetically, oftimes deceitfully, by liberal academics, that all three of these necessities - structure, ultimate value, and truth - are scarcely addressed at all in any formal sense. Properly resolved they would advance our nationalism considerably towards becoming the holistic and original philosophy we desire it to be. But they are not the only unresolved issues. The problem of becoming, or human purpose, and the problem of the individual and his freedom also cast a long shadow, as does the problem of the sheer scale of the revolutionary endeavour. With all that in mind, then, we will now try to make some progress, or at least some useful observations, commencing in this essay with the problems of structure and of becoming. Value, truth, and the individual must await a part four, and even five. The problem of structure As explained previously in this series, we routinely profess ourselves to be ethnic nationalists, espousers of a communicable philosophy. Really, though, the most that can be said of us is that we are nativists. Nativism at least has a structure to it. It is defensive and survivalist. It is the politics of the place of arising ... home, the source of the people, the parent of their distinctiveness. It is important. But it can never rise to the station of a positive, organising system for living ... never get beyond defence of the people’s life and land. Descriptively, a nationalism of ethnicity must be holistic, naturalistic, existential, authenticising, universal (in the sense of true of all peoples), defensive before it is expansive, and preserving before it is conserving. As the political expression of the native principle, it is the politics of ethnic genesis on the soil and so of the natural right ... the native right ... to defend kind and home. It is, then, the active politics of genetic interests, of the kin relation. As the politics of all settled peoples it is the politics of peace and the complete antidote to liberalism’s post-Christian and anti-European universalism. It is the politics of consciousness of being. It is the politics of the authentic in us individually and, therefore, collectively, because consciousness in a people, like natural wisdom in a crowd, is accreting. But what are the principles underpinning all this? How do they articulate socially? The following (tentatively proposed) structural scheme may take things forward: It exhibits a rather extensive collection of base principles and, in the upper range, a row of states leading to triads of active processes. All are arrayed across three distinct but interlocking dynamics, shown here as rising columns.
Why do corporations whose business model is constructed on mass production and mass consumption think they can continue to survive in an age of reduced and reducing population and “sustainability”? Who will buy Fiats and Fords when no one owns a vehicle?
And so the deceitful drip-feed of the bad news about the future continues. Car-owning is just one area of dispossession slated for the little people. According to the infamous (now deleted) WEF article everything ... even the clothes on our back ... will be rented from a corporation. Consumption will crash. Manufacturing will die. So why do no major manufacturers or industry bodies resist? Well, the car manufacturers, certainly, seem to expect continued high-volume sales of their products to the rental markets of the smart city pod-scape and the blob-on-a-bed of the metaverse. As some deluded management geek wrote at Forbes:
But there isn’t any customer loyalty to the manufacturer in pay-per-use. The pleasure of ownership leads to an entirely different qualitative expectation from that of mere utility, where competitive pressures and the absence of customer loyalty will inevitably lead to low-quality, throw-away products with minimal profit potential. So why are the car producers - or, indeed, any of the quality-oriented life-style mass-producers - eagerly going along with a fake “sustainable” market system that they can’t survive? They’re not mad environmentalists. Their chief executives are not paid to crash the company. One wonders if the real reason is peer pressure at the Davos forum and the other nests of globalism, and cowardice and fear about standing out from the lemming-herd does the rest.
A comment on Judaism, which I made in response to a perfectly decent and honest Orthodox Jew at the Disqus page for a Speccie article on Arab anti-Semitism in London. The comment pulls together much of my current view on the Jewish Question.
Yesterday, after trailing his skirts for several months, Eric Zemmour finally announced his candidature for next April’s French presidential election. He did so with a brilliantly crafted speech, which I reproduce below. Nationalists, meanwhile ... real ones ... have likely already discounted the possibility that a Jewish anti-Islamist and culturist would, if elected, deliver a nationalist outcome. Yes, he says “The Third Worldization of our country and our people impoverishes it as much as it disrupts it, ruins it as much as it torments it.” But he also says, “So that the French will feel at home again and so that the latest arrivals assimilate to their culture and appropriate their history.” Then there is much confusion caused by his adoption of Renaud Camus’s grand remplacement terminology (which Marine Le Pen has not taken up). Does that signify adoption of the theory as such? Is he at all hostile to non-Muslim foreignisation, if those foreigners integrate culturally? Yes, he says “we will not allow ourselves to be replaced”. Yes, he speaks of “the minorities who never stop tyrannizing the majority”, but is he speaking only of Muslims, Islam and jihad? The one certainty is that his language and his candidacy will push the future of the true French to the centre of the campaign, and force the traitor-parties to speak of the one thing of which they are most afraid. If, as seems possible, Zemmour beats Le Pen and the other challengers to proceed to the second round against Macron (presumeably), the Great Question of nationalism is very likely to become the great question of French politics, win or lose. That much this man can do for true nationalists. Here is his speech:
The following is an extended reply to a conversation with Thorn and a question from him on the matter of faith and conversion. To answer that, I am not going to answer that. I am going to contextualise my non-answer by talking a little instead about the parallels between spirital liberation and the beatific on the one hand and the nationalism of ethnicity and awakening on the other, and about both of these and authenticity. For all of us as human beings, an awakening consciousness of our own Being assorts as either a spiritual or ethnic liberation according to its character and content. Both question that which is formed in us quite mechanically from the world around us. Both seek the freeing, conscious experience of the essential. But the way to that estate is narrow. A spiritual liberation properly commences with an individual’s detachment from the voiding psychological mechanicity of his ordinary inner functioning. As a human event, this liberation is esoteric in nature, and its understanding and undertaking is really only possible for men and women with the most remarkable dedication to and discrimination for truth. Luck also plays its part. Just to have the psychological grounding to generate the required epiphany (that “the problem” lies in our enworldment and its powerfully habituating effect upon certain mind-functions) is rare and remarkable in itself. That alone makes a searcher of the subject, and brings him or her to the boundary of the esoteric. For a Westerner then to go on and (a) find and (b) gain entry to a source of the necessary, extremely carefully curated technical (not religious) knowledge is akin, chance-wise, to a non-trivial win on the lottery. Fragments of that knowledge ... just strings of words ... appear in the New Testament, but nothing can be reconstructed from them. Likewise, odd references appear in formal Christian belief and rite, but they are lost to other familiarities. There are reportedly surviving elements in the spiritual devotions and exercises of the dwindling roster of religious orders. But this knowledge is preserved to a much greater degree in Sufism, Hindu mysticism, and Buddhism.
Page 7 of 338 | First Page | Previous Page | [ 5 ] [ 6 ] [ 7 ] [ 8 ] [ 9 ] | Next Page | Last Page |
|
![]() Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsLinksMR Central & NewsCommentsManc commented in entry 'Charles crowned king of anywhere' on Thu, 09 Jan 2025 20:31. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 07 Jan 2025 21:54. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:42. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:13. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:11. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Wed, 18 Dec 2024 01:41. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Wed, 18 Dec 2024 01:24. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 21:35. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 20:51. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 19:49. (View) Manc commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Sat, 14 Dec 2024 18:47. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Trout Mask Replica' on Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:29. (View) ![]() ![]() |